Home » Posts » Bending Performance of MS, SAE 1010, SAE 1015, SAE 1018, and IS 2062 E250 – A Practical Comparison
Steel bar bending comparison of MS, SAE 1018, IS2062

Bending Performance of MS, SAE 1010, SAE 1015, SAE 1018, and IS 2062 E250 – A Practical Comparison

When it comes to bending operations in fabrication, forming, and machining industries, selecting the right steel grade can make a noticeable difference in output quality, rejection rates, tool life, and operator effort.

This article compares the bending behavior of five commonly used low-carbon steels:

  • Mild Steel (MS)

  • SAE 1010

  • SAE 1015

  • SAE 1018

  • IS 2062 E250


🔧 Steel Grades Compared: Bending Properties

Property / Grade MS (Generic) SAE 1010 SAE 1015 SAE 1018 IS 2062 E250 (Fe410W)
Carbon Content (%) ~0.15 max ~0.08–0.13 ~0.13–0.18 ~0.15–0.20 ~0.20 max
Ductility High Very High High Moderate Moderate
Tensile Strength (MPa) ~350–410 (approx) ~330–420 ~380–450 ~440–500 ≥410
Yield Strength (MPa) ~250 max ~170–250 ~200–280 ~250–320 ≥250
Cold Bending Suitability Very Good Excellent Very Good Good Moderate (lot-dependent)
Springback After Bend Low Very Low Low Moderate Moderate to High
Crack Risk at Tight Radius Low Very Low Low Medium Medium to High
Surface Finish After Bend Depends on source Good Good Good Moderate (scaly finish)
Availability in Bright Form Limited Available Available Widely Available Mostly hot rolled
Typical Uses General bending, brackets Automotive parts, deep draw Tubes, mild bend parts Shafts, CNC precision parts Structural fabrication

🧠 What the Data Means for Bending Applications

✅ 1. Best for Tight Radius Bending: SAE 1010

  • Lowest carbon content → high ductility

  • Minimal springback

  • Highly suited for sharp, deep, and small-radius bends


✅ 2. General Purpose Bending: MS and SAE 1015

  • Mild Steel (MS) is easy to source, economical, and ductile

  • SAE 1015 has slightly higher strength but retains good bendability

Use these when:

  • You’re forming medium-radius parts

  • Cost is a constraint

  • Bright finish is not critical


⚠️ 3. Use with Caution: SAE 1018

  • Cold drawn 1018 may be harder and exhibit springback

  • May crack under tight radius unless annealed

  • Great dimensional control, but not ideal for sharp bends unless softened

Best used for:

  • Precision forming, CNC bending, or applications requiring higher strength after bending


⚠️ 4. Least Preferred for Critical Bends: IS 2062 E250

  • Designed as a structural steel—not optimized for forming

  • Surface is rougher and ductility is variable across heats

  • More prone to cracking or wrinkling at tight bend radii

Use this for:

  • Gradual bends

  • Heavy fabrication where tolerances are relaxed


🔍 Cold Drawn vs Hot Rolled Impact on Bending

  • Bright Bars (cold drawn): Higher strength → more springback → risk of surface cracks in tight bends

  • Black Bars (hot rolled): Softer, easier to bend, but lower dimensional accuracy and poorer finish

💡 For tight bends using bright bars like 1018: annealing before bending is strongly recommended.


🔚 Conclusion

Choosing the right steel grade for bending is about understanding the trade-off between:

  • Strength vs Ductility

  • Surface finish vs Formability

  • Cost vs Performance

Application Type Best Grades
Sharp bends, deep draw SAE 1010, SAE 1015
Manual bending Mild Steel (MS), SAE 1010
CNC / Precision press brake SAE 1018 (annealed)
Structural bending IS 2062 E250

📌 When in doubt, always validate with a trial bend and check the heat-specific test certificate (TC).

Select your currency
INR Rupia Indiana